Ancient Near Eastern Thought Essay - 3623 Words

Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament (Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible) Introduction Using contemporary studies as the foundation of his research John Walton reviews the ancient and Near Eastern and Israelite cognitive context. He provides guidance for students and general public to have a wider understanding and expand their knowledge of today’s culture, and historical culture interacts with the ancient world culture. In doing so, he tries to balance all audiences though examining artifacts to assist the individual’s understanding through these artifacts about both the historical prospective and culture and the parallel with the Bible. Summary of Book The book is divided into five parts. Part 1,†¦show more content†¦What follows is a discussion about the types and characteristics of religious practices. In particular, the discussion hinges on establishing the point that there are reflections of wisdom in all knowledge. In these and other ways, comparative studies both challenged and enhanced biblical scholarship. Walton also discusses the reaction to comparative studies in confessional scholarship, which has not always been positive due to its implication that the Old Testament is not unique (p. 35). Walton concludes by envisioning an integrated role for comparative studies in which it assists in critical analysis, defense of the biblical text, and exegesis of the biblical text (pp. 38-40). In conclusion, Part 1 of Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament serve as an excellent introduction to comparative studies. Part 2 – Literature of the Ancient Near East Chapter 3 – Summary of Literature of Ancient Near East Chapter 3 is divided up into 4 sections. These are: 1) myths, 2) literary texts and epics, 3) ritual texts, and 4) divination/incantation texts 5) letters, 6)Royal Inscrriptions 7) Annals/Chronicles, 8) Treaties, 9) Law Collections, 10) Legal Documents, Hymns and Prayers, 11) Wisdom Literature, 12) Prophecy, 13) Fictional Autobiography/Apocalyptic 14) Archives and 15) Miscellaneous. Under each of those sections there are examples of writings on that topic from various ancient Near Eastern cultures. The areasShow MoreRelatedBook Summary of John H. Walton, Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament:4623 Words   |  19 PagesJohn H. Walton’s Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible is broken up into fourteen chapters. Those fourteen chapters are each part of one of five sections. This book also contains over twenty historical images. Befor e the introduction, the author gives readers a full appendix of all images used in this published work. The author then gives his acknowledgements followed by a list of abbreviations. Part 1- Comparative studies TheRead MoreThe Museum Of Fine Arts751 Words   |  4 Pageswriting to you to express my interest in the job opportunity â€Å"Terrace Research Associate in Egyptian Art† in the Department of Art of the Ancient World, one of open staff positions in Museum of Fine Arts (MFA) Boston next Summer. As an applicant for the job opportunity in Museum of Fine Arts (MFA) Boston, I would be interested in the division, the Arts of Ancient Egypt collections I hold a Bachelor’s degree in Egyptology from Cairo University in Egypt, where I studied in its prestigious DepartmentRead MoreIntroduction The great American scholar, William Foxwell Albright was an American Biblical800 Words   |  4 Pagesreferred as the ‘father of biblical archaeology’† He was considered an expert in many areas of study associated to the ancient Near East, particularly the Old Testament. â€Å"Albright’s most enduring legacy is his contribution to the establishment of a new paradigm of ancient Near Eastern Studies called biblical archaeology.† Furthermore, Albright was an authority on Near Eastern languages and became known in the archaeological world for his authentication of the Dead Sea Scrolls. His archaeologicalRead MoreThe Visit At The Metropolitan Museum Of Art1310 Words   |  6 Pagesthe thanksgiving break I visited the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The Met is an art museum in New York City that has a variety of ancient artwork from different cultures and time periods. There is paintings and sculptures from Ancient Egypt, Ancient Rome and Greece. The museum is additionally home to artwork from many different time periods including ancient Near Eastern Art, Middle Ages and Europe during the Renaissance. The Met also has artwork from many different religions such as ChristianityRead MoreGENESIS AND ANCIENT MYTHS OF THE NEAR EAST930 Words   |  4 Pagesapproaches the biblical text, it is important to explore the cultural context in which the text occurs. With regard to the Book of Genesis, it is important to examine the writing with other contemporary works of similar geography and topics. The people of ancient Mesopotamia, where the oldest civilizations originated, pr oduced a number of stories of creation and natural occurrences. It is important to note that many of the stories of the Sumerians, Akkadians and Hebrews began as oral traditions as the eventsRead MoreThe First Address Of Moses Essay925 Words   |  4 Pagesceremony to be performed after they taken the land. II. Parallels from the Ancient World A. Deuteronomy contains Moses farewell speeches, arranged in a document format or types of treaties common in the ancient near East. A covenant is a means of establishing a binding relationship that does not naturally exist otherwise. B. The Hittite Parallels: This treaty structure was used by different nation in the ancient near Eastern history, our purposes are found in Hittite documents. These Hittite suzeraintyRead MoreCivilization is Connected from the Mesopotamians to the Powerful Roman Empire836 Words   |  4 Pagesfor Hammurabi’s Code of law to be written and preserved through the ages. The Phoenicians took this concept another step forward and fashioned the alphabet. The ability to record history is an exceptional achievement. Another development of the Ancient Near East was architecture. The Egyptian pyramids, and the Babylonian ziggurats stand as testimony to their society’s technological and architectural achievements. The Assyrians left a lasting impact on civilization with the advent of the idea of conquestRead MoreAncient Eastern Thought and the Old Testament Essay10692 Words   |  43 PagesLIBERTY UNIVERSITY THE BIBLE AMONG THE MYTHS JOHN, N. OSWALT A SUMMARY PAPER OF THE TEXT ANCIENT NEAR EASTERN THOUGHT AND THE OLD TESTAMENT SUBMITTED TO DR. RANDY G. HANEY DEPARTMENT OF THEOLOGY BY 03 MARCH 2013 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: HISTORY AND METHODS 3 CHAPTER 2: COMPARATIVE STUDIES, SCHOLARSHIP, AND THEOLOGY 6 CHAPTER 3: SUMMARY OF THE LITERATURE OF THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST 10 CHAPTER 4: THE GODS 14 CHAPTER 5: TEMPLES AND RITUALS 19 CHAPTER 6: STATE AND FAMILYRead MoreEssay on Book Summary of the Bible Among the Myths2904 Words   |  12 PagesIntroduction Author John N. Oswalt begins The Bible Among the Myths: Unique Revelation or Just Ancient Literature? with a concise and well-written introduction that whets the reader’s appetite, compelling one to continue reading. He begins by informing the reader that his novel has been in the works dating all of the way back to the 1960s, when he attended the Asbury Theological Seminary. Oswalt quickly points out that one of the main points that the book will focus on is determining if â€Å"theRead MoreEssay on Hebrew Nomads View on the Creation1180 Words   |  5 PagesHebrew Nomads View on Genesis People have been trying to explain the existence of humans and the origins of our world since ancient times. There are many different theories and myths that attempt to describe the earliest beginnings of our present world. In the Ancient Near East one of the most popular creation myths was the Babylonian creation myth also known as Enuma Elish. Hebrew nomads like Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and David lived in tents while traveling to different locations in search

Analysis Of The Article Every Kid Needs A Champion

The Right Way to be a Teacher Imagine, no one is there to help a child get through their education. Instead of energetically learning and intellectually growing, children instead drift aimlessly through the ranks of their education. They simply hear and regurgitate information that the teacher† repeats monotonously from a textbook. Sad isn t it? This is what Rita Pierson is trying to eliminate with her speech Every Kid Needs a Champion†. She advocates the need for teachers to go beyond what their simple title of teacher† requires, meaning teachers should be more to a student than a simple lecturer. In order to do this Pierson has to get the audience to listen and understand the gravity of what she is saying, making them motivated to make the difference that she wants of them when they leave. In order to effectively portray her idea that teachers should not simply be teachers but mentors, Rita Pierson, in her speech â€Å"Every Kid Needs a Champion†, establishes herself to the audience whi le playing on the their emotions with her humorous and somber anecdotes to focus and motivate them to act, as well as engaging them with her energetic physical movement, such as hand motions and variation in tone. Pierson’s lifelong experience and commitment to being a teacher makes her a credible source on the subject of education. The first words of her speech plainly tell the audience exactly who she and her family are (Pierson). When the audience hears her say that she has spent herShow MoreRelatedStrider 12 Pro No Pedal Balance Bike1027 Words   |  5 PagesStrider 12 Pro No-Pedal Balance Bike, Silver reviews Introduction: Your Strider 12 pro sports model gives every single feature a little one (as well as parent or guardian) may desire. It does not take excellent balance involving functionality, possibilities, along with price, presenting over 8 several years involving design and style progression along with making changes. Handlebar: Exclusive 12. 7mm material handlebar can be 43% smaller sized when compared with normal to let greater command usingRead MoreMcdonalds Marketing Plan3867 Words   |  16 Pagesof 4 components namely analyzing opportunities, selecting target markets, developing the marketing mix and managing the marketing effort. All in all McDonald’s carries out an effective marketing research enabling it to discover unfulfilled customer needs and updating or introducing food items accordingly. The report then goes on to talk about the sections of a marketing plan for McDonald’s. McDonald’s has become one of the most famous brand names globally and this has been ach ieved partly through theirRead MoreMedia Violence And Its Effects On The Readers2212 Words   |  9 PagesViolence is considered very prevalent amongst kids and young teens, due to what they see in media. Whether it is through television, radio, internet, movies, books, video games or newspapers, children get exposed to unfiltered violence beginning from a very young age. Many debate whether or not violence shown in media causes violence in kids, but there are two perceptions to this. Either, kids will reproduce the things they see in media, or it will help kids prepare for violence and actually learn howRead MoreHerb Brooks2476 Words   |  10 PagesTable of Contents Background: Followers and Situation: Contextual and Operational Leadership: Motivational Approach: Theories/ Models: Analysis: Lessons Learned: Works Cited: Background â€Å"Do you believe in Miracles?† asked ABC-TV announcer Al Michaels as the final round game between the Soviet Union and the United States Men’s Ice Hockey team came to an end in the 1980 Olympic games in Lake Placid, New York (infoplease.com). For some individuals, this may have been considered just anRead More Media Violence is Not the Problem - The Problem is in Our Homes, our Schools, and our Communities3259 Words   |  14 Pagesviewers? If so, to what extent? Do viewers retain models of behavior from their exposure to media violence? Do these models resurface later on during their coming of age? These are hard questions that may not have definite answers; however, a clear analysis on many studies reveals that we’ve only begun to scratch the surface. On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, America revisited a national tragedy that occurred in Littleton, Colorado four years ago. When authorities released the video Rampant Range,Read MoreThe Fiscal Health Of Target Corporation3112 Words   |  13 Pagesexample of how a Corporation deals with adversity while maintaining a competitive position. 2. Firm, Industry, and Environment a. Summary description the firm including a brief description of the key product or service, the relevant market, and analysis of demand including the principle factors that influence demand, and the implications for revenue. Target is America’s second largest retail store that offers a variety of products to include clothes, furniture, clothes, shoes and day to day essentialRead MoreBrand and Biscuits10564 Words   |  43 Pagesminds occasionally and I hope that our data analysis and key findings will throw some more light on Biscuit industry. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS S.NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 CONTENTS ABSTRACT†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW†¦ COMPANIES PROFILE†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. METHEDOLOGY†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. DETAILS OF MARKEING STRATEGY USED BY MAJOR PLAYER IN INDUSTRY†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦....... PAGE NO. 7 8 9 10 11 QUESTIONNIER DATA ANALYSIS†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ OBSERVATION FINDINGS†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..... CONCLUSIONRead MoreIndividual Assessment Cover Sheet / Plagiarism Declaration Form8448 Words   |  34 PagesEXHIBITIONS 13 MICE IN SYDNEY 13 HILTON HOTEL 13 FOUR POINTS BY SHERATON HOTEL 13 PARK HYATT SYDNEY 13 COMPETITION ANALYSIS: 14 COMPARISON 15 TOPIC 8 - CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE GLOBAL HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY 16 HOW HOSPITALITY OPERATORS GET ENGAGE IN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) 16 ENVIRONMENT 16 COMMUNITY 16 MARKET PLACE 17 EMPLOYEES OR WORKFORCE 17 CHAMPIONS OF CSR IN THE INTERNATIONAL HOTEL INDUSTRY 17 ACCOR HOTELS 17 INITIATIVES 18 HILTON HOTELS 19 INITIATIVES : 19 TOPICRead MoreThe One and Done Rule: Nba6757 Words   |  28 Pagesthe most controversial rules in all of sports, which is known as the one and done rule. The one and done rule restricts high school basketball players from entering the NBA draft out of high school and going to straight to the NBA. According to Article X, Section 1 of the NBAs 2005 collective bargaining agreement (CBA), the policy for player eligibility states: The player (A) is or will be at least 19 years of age during the calendar year in which the Draft is held, and (B) with respect to a playerRead MoreGillette Brand Analysis3823 Words   |  16 PagesTable of Contents Appendices 1 1. Background 3 1.1 Company 3 1.2 Market 3 1.3 Competition 4 2. Brand analysis 4 2.1 Brand attitude 4 2.1.1 The Rossiter-Percy grid 5 2.2 Brand identity 5 2.2.1 Brand Name 6 2.2.2 Packaging 7 2.2.3 Identity Prism 8 2.2.3 Brand personality 9 3. Positioning 10 3.1 Possible positioning statements 11 3.1.1 Comparisons 12 3.1.2 Contrast between two statements 12 4. Celebrity endorsement 13 4.1 David Beckham and

Apple Strategy

Question: A formidable new product development powerhouse of global proportions, Apple is worthy of our study and interest Answer: Introduction Apple Inc. and its subsidiaries plans, makes and markets versatile mobile communication gadgets, PCs, and convenient computerized music players. They offer a mixed bag of related programming, administrations, peripherals, organizing arrangements, and advanced substance and applications. The Company's products and services incorporate Mac, iPhone, iPad, iPod, Apple TV, an arrangement of shopper and expert programming applications, the Mac OS X and iOS working frameworks, iCloud, and a mixed bag of embellishment, administration and help off. As a feature of its methodology, the Company keeps on growing its stage for the revelation and conveyance of outsider advanced substance and applications through their iTunes Store (Innovation management 2012). Apples strategies Arenas: Apple as an association manufactured products that are well designed and easy to use. This provided for them a recognized brand picture in the business that stands out in the market despite numerous contenders. Apple's product development method is the study in market segmentation. Where Apple totally rebooted ipod nano, moved back the ipod mix to a prior communication model, and majorly forked the ipod Touch in a manner that additionally identifies with iphone situating (Easy marketing 2013). Differentiators: Apple focuses on quality rather than cost - served mostly to strengthen their contention that Apple values incredible over all other products. Apples design has made various enchantments" or "supernatural" items (Innovation management 2012). Vehicles: Apple entered into partnership with various industry leaders in business sector that helps in mixing up the qualities of various organizations. It helps in undertaking versatility through another class of business applications bringing IBM's huge information and examination abilities to ipad and iphone . The point of interest organization intends to reclassify the way work would accomplish, location key industry portability difficulties and start genuine portable drove business change-grounded. IBM cloud administrations streamlined for ios, including gadget administration, security, investigation and versatile combination; new Applecare administration and help offering custom-made to the needs of the venture. Along with IBM Apple was also in talks with Tesla motors for joint ventures (Easy marketing 2013). Staging Pacing: Apple will burn through $10 billion putting resources into its future. That is an enormous increment over a year ago, and it wrecks the mainstream idea that the organization is floating off into a profoundly focused business sector with no genuine arrangements for developing in the coming future. Apple has 424 stores, including 255 in the U.S. The organization has opened its first store in Turkey and Brazil to grow its geographic foot shaped impression to 15 nations. Apple developed its retail deals to $20.2 billion last year, or 12% of the organization's aggregate, from $14.1 billion in 2011. Economic logic: Apple Inc. also its entirely claimed auxiliaries outlines, fabricates, and markets versatile correspondence and media gadgets, PCs, and compact advanced music players, and offers a mixture of related programming, administrations, peripherals, organizing arrangements, and outsider computerized substance and applications (Emerald group 2013). The Company perceives income from the offer of fittings items, programming packaged with equipment that is crucial to the usefulness of the fittings, and outsider computerized substance sold in iTunes Store as per general income distinguishment bookkeeping direction. The Company perceives income as per industry particular programming bookkeeping direction for the accompanying sorts of offers exchanges: (i) standalone offers of programming items, (ii) offers of programming updates and (iii) offers of programming packaged with fittings not key to the usefulness of the equipment. New product launch strategies The launch of Apple Watch was a proactive strategy and it has gone down well with the consumers. The iWatch comes with interactive features that help the users to read messages and chat with their friends. There are other applications like maps, activity, motion and fitness (Easy marketing 2013). This futuristic technology included in the iWatch is a proactive strategy by Apple that would help them attract more and more consumers and dominate the gadgets markets. It works on the latest version of iOS and Apple will also include third party applications in the iWatch that improves it flexibility and ease in use (Emerald group 2013). Conclusion By administering item advancement to the voice of the buyer, Apple had the capacity advantage from the best tablet dispatch in its history. Listening to your client is something a firm of any size can do. The new approach to Apple's items seems to reflect a more prominent adaptability; thinks are more alterable than they were before Cook took the reins, if just barely. There's still the inquiry of keeping reasonable of enraging early buyers of items, as somebody who has purchased an ipad four months earlier would like to see another model. References Innovation management 2012, 5 skills that transform your organization, accessed on 15th January 2015, Easy marketing 2013, Product strategy of Apple, accessed on 15th January 2015, Emerald group 2013, Apple iPod: succeeding where others failed, accessed on 15th January 2015,

Top 70 compare and contrast essay topics

A compare and contrast essay revolves around finding and analyzing the similarities and differences between two subjects belonging to the same category. If you have been assigned a compare and contrast essay, then you’re probably looking for interesting topics that you can write on, right? Steer forward with us! Quick Links 1. Compare and Contrast Essay Topics 1.1 Compare and Contrast Essay Topics for College Students 1.2 Compare and Contrast Essay Topics for High School Students 1.3 Compare and Contrast Essay Topics Middle School 1.4 Psychology Compare and Contrast Essay Topics 1.5 Sports Compare and Contrast Essay Topics 1.6 Art History Compare and Contrast Essay Topics 1.7 Funny Compare and Contrast Essay Topics 2. Conclusion 2.1 Help Me Write My Essay 1. Compare and Contrast Essay Topics The most essential point that you must keep in mind when choosing a compare and contrast essay topic is to go for the subjects that belong to the same category. For instance, you can’t choose football and 19th century art. When writing a compare and contrast essay, and before you get to the comparison, write a few sentences stating how they are related and the reason why the two subjects should be compared. We have made this job easier for you and categorized different compare and contrast essay topics that you can use to write your effective essay. 1.1 Compare and Contrast Essay Topics for College Students How does high school differ from college? Students with or without part-time jobs Essay Vs. Research Paper: What is more challenging? Homeschooling Vs. Traditional Schooling SAT Vs. GRE: What is more difficult? Masters Vs. Ph.D.: What helps strengthen your career? Differences between Islam and Christianity Introverts Vs. Extroverts Real-life dating Vs. Online dating How do education and employment compare? 1.2 Compare and Contrast Essay Topics for High School Students Friends Vs. Family Childhood friendship Vs. High school friendship Adolf Hitler Vs. Joseph Stalin Study abroad Vs. Studying in your country Living on your own Vs. At home with parents. Ryan Reynolds Vs. Ryan Gosling In-house employees Vs. Freelance contractors Texting Vs. In person conversations Working out or dieting: What is more effective for weight loss? Being in a relationship or being single 1.3 Compare and Contrast Essay Topics Middle School Basketball Vs. Football Compare two plays written by Shakespeare Running Vs. Swimming Reading minds Vs. Being invisible Doctor Vs. Nurse Breakdance Vs. Ballet: What is more difficult? World war I Vs. World War II Chocolate Bar Vs. Chocolate Ice-cream Compare two of your favorite movies Reading books Vs. Watching movies 1.4 Psychology Compare and Contrast Essay Topics Anxiety Vs. Depression: What is similar between the two? Differences between hallucinations and illusive dreams Agoraphobia Vs. Claustrophobia: What is worse? Compare suicide and homicide Autism Vs. Down syndrome B. F. Skinner theory Vs. John B. Watson theory Anorexia Vs. Bulimia: what is unhealthier? Social anxiety or fear of public speaking How does psychological development differ in children that grow up in normal families and orphans? Ego Vs. Superego 1.5 Sports Compare and Contrast Essay Topics Women’s football team, Vs. Men’s Chess Vs. Checkers Football Vs. Cricket: Which is better? Sachin Tendulkar Vs. Ricky Ponting Roger Federer Vs. Rafael Nadal Rugby and Soccer Wayne Rooney and Lionel Messi Ice climbing Vs. Traditional climbing Knicks Vs. Nets Aikido Vs. Judo 1.6 Art History Compare and Contrast Essay Topics Baroque Vs. Mycenaean Period Mosaic Vs. Raku 2D Vs. 3D Compare the 19th Century Art Brunelleschi and The Romans Impressionism and Post-Impressionism Roxanna and Dorian Gray Compare Kafka's Metamorphosis and Albert Camus’ The Stranger Macbeth and Othello Tapestry Vs. Fresco 1.7 Funny Compare and Contrast Essay Topics Beyoncà © Vs. Rihanna Kim Kardashian Vs. Paris Hilton Ellen DeGeneres Vs. Oprah Winfrey Pet dogs Vs. Pet cats F.R.I.E.N.D.S Vs. How I met your mother Lollipops Vs. Popsicles Drama Vs. Comedy Email Vs. Pigeon Post Credit card Vs. Cash Star Trek Vs. Star Wars Need more topics for your essay? Use our Essay Topic Generator and get unique ideas for your essay! 2. Conclusion Are these topic ideas helpful? Did you get what you were looking for? Now then you have chosen a topic for your essay, you can start composing it. For that, you have to follow a structured essay outline. considering the similarities and differences between the two subjects. Here is a step by step guide on how to write a compare and contrast essay 2.1 Help Me Write My Essay Still finding it difficult to choose a topic or to write compare and contrast essay? It is completely understandable. But don’t worry! We have got your back. 5staressays; holds a remarkable place in the market, because of unbeatable services and customer satisfaction. Our highly qualified professionals are ready to take your orders round the clock. Place your order today and get instant relief from all your academic worries and depression.

Capital Punishment

Capital Punishment Free Online Research Papers In my opinion capital punishment is morally not right. I am from Germany, were death penalty is nowadays prohibited by law for many years. Everybody is able to live there as an individual and around the next corner will not someone be waiting to kill you. But I think in some cases it would be very helpful to make capital punishment legal, as in the case of serial killers or people that do not learn form being imprisoned and commit a number of other crimes. I think the people that decide if a murderer get executed or not, and the people that fulfill an execution are murderers on their own. This does not make them much better than the person that was killed. It is morally not right to kill other people, just because they did kill someone. Murderers should stay imprisoned for many years and get a second chance to show good will. Then when they get free and commit another crime, then they should be punished for it. In this case I would really be for capital punishment because this person did not use the second chance to change and did not learn anything from the time spent in prison. I found out in some research that â€Å"the mix of drugs is unacceptable for putting dogs and cats to sleep† (http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ehost/pdf?vid=1hid=7sid=70c7fc1c-6945-468c-b6cb-234d4e8513b6%40sessionmgr7), so why should we use this mix of drugs to execute a person like us? This mix was invented by DR. Jay Chapman, that did not even have any knowledge about killing someone. There are also many reasons people kill other people. Some people are mentally ill and need rather a therapy than many years in prison; other people just kill for fun and will never learn, such as serial killers. Then there are also people that had to kill because they were in a certain situation and had to act in affect. While I was living in Germany, I sometimes heard about people that got the death penalty and were not even guilty. I think if there would not be a death penalty in too many cases, it would be more likely avoided to execute a wrong person. Even that people know that there is capital punishment in 22 states, do some people not care about it and still commit horrible crimes. If someone would want to stop crime at all, there must be a death penalty for almost every crime. This is already impossible by law written down in the â€Å"Bill of Rights†. A lot more cases of murders could be eliminated if the U.S. would change the regulations for weapons. People should not be allowed to buy weapons everywhere and to carry them around. People should obtain a license and they should only be allowed to have weapons for hunting in the woods and shooting at ranges. Another point that speaks against executions is, that the public has to pay for the executions. This means that tax payers are paying money to execute someone. I personally rather would pay money to keep someone imprisoned for a long time, than to pay for a execution. I also believe that it is gods decision to let someone die. So a murderer only fulfills gods will to kill a special person. It always hurts the family and people that knew the person that was killed. Another point I think that will be important for the future of the U.S. is that capital punishment should be limited or prohibited by law. Even in Puerto Rico, which is a territory of the U.S., the last death sentence executed was in 1927 and two years later the government abolished capital punishment. Today â€Å"two- thirds of Puerto Ricans oppose death penalty† (http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ehost/pdf?vid=1hid=8sid=d2944897-fd00-4842-9f32-a87c6735dabe%40sessionmgr3) and might be happy that it is prohibited now. In my opinion the US seems to live in the future but for real it still lives in the past. A country can be kept save using other ways than capital punishment. Many countries in the world do not support capital punishment and do prohibit it by law. These countries live in the future, know how to punish people right and know what is morally right. Research Papers on Capital PunishmentCapital PunishmentArguments for Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS)The Effects of Illegal ImmigrationThe Fifth HorsemanComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoGenetic EngineeringPersonal Experience with Teen PregnancyThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UseThe Masque of the Red Death Room meaningsAnalysis of Ebay Expanding into Asia Capital Punishment Free Online Research Papers The use of capital punishment is believed to deter future acts of crimes and deter the number of people who commit these crimes. Many years ago, capital punishment was almost used for anything such as stealing, murder, rape and even disrespect toward a higher authority but now it has been abolished in all countries except for the United States. Some believe that capital punishment should become, under law, a regular form of punishment and should be used against the ones who commit crimes. People who want to use it believe that it is the only justice that could be given to the victims of these crimes and to their families. In my opinion I don’t believe that the use of capital punishment makes any situation better or even brings back justice to the victim or their family. Even though it might see like the right idea, is this process really justified? If we are against murder it wouldn’t be right to commit the act ourselves, we would be contradicting ourselves. Is it reall y retributive justice? Or is it in fact a way to get back at the convicted and get the revenge they desire for. Before the use of capital punishment and prisons, when people participated in crimes, it would go unnoticed. As the government started to grow, they decided they had to change this. So the world created a system, which was used for two main purposes: to keep people who caused danger to others and/or also to themselves away from the community and the second was to rehabilitate those who were considered morally wrong for their actions and the community would be able to release them back into society. This is why they called it correctional facilities, to correct peoples’ wrong doings. It seemed like society had come up with a way to help reduce crimes. So how did capital punishment come into the picture? When executions were first used it was used by rulers in higher power. Executions were not just used to give the convicted what they deserved. Many people were executed because they robbed someone or went against that higher power. Executions were used to make an example out of that person and show everyone who had the power and let them know that you could not go against them. It seems not to some that incarceration is not doing enough and not creating the effect people thought it would. Now executions are seen as retributive justice. â€Å"Retributive justice is a theory of justice that considers that proportionate punishment is a morally acceptable response to crime, with an eye to the satisfaction and psychological benefits it can bestow to the aggrieved party and its intimates.† (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retributive_justice) Sentences to death row mainly consist of murderers and repeated offenders of heinous acts. After committing such heinous crimes, people believe that there is no way to help the convicted. They feel as though letting them out into the community would just put other peoples’ lives in danger. Retributive justice is a way to make the lives of the ones who were affected by the crime a little easier to cope with the pain. Since their loved ones’ lives were taken away, the one who committed the act will have his life taken as well. Since the murderers took others’ lives, society believes that they have forfeited their right to life. If we execute murderers and there is in fact no deterrent effect, we have killed a bunch of murderers. If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims. I would much rather risk the former. This, to me, is not a tough call. (John McAdams Marquette University/Department of Political Science, on deterrence, (prodeathpenalty.com/). As I had stated in my past essay, people would rather risk a murder’s life for no effect in helping the community than letting him go and having him commit more murders or other acts of violence and risking innocent lives. Once someone has commit a crime such as murder, that person did not value their victims’ life and obviously must not have valued their own life so why should anyone else take their life into consideration? Their life is of no importance so taking that away shouldn’t be a big problem. Even if you think they valued their li fe the other side is that they will probably go out and do it again. â€Å"Fifty-six percent of the violent felons convicted from 1990 through 2002 had a prior conviction, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistic †¦ the study found that at the time of the new crime 18 percent were on probation, 12 percent on release pending disposition of a prior case and 7 percent on parole.† (â€Å"Organized Crime Digest† Sept 30, 2006) This is where the use of capital punishment comes in. When society believes that they have a criminal who cannot be corrected and he is considered a threat to that society and himself, what is the use of him? Why keep him locked up for the rest of his life when he doesn’t even deserve that right? People who are for capital punishment would give the answer that there is no need for them to stay alive. Saving the society from future harm and giving back justice to the victims and their loved ones; that is the use of capital punishment. On the other side, if we are talking about what is morally right than most people of the U.S see the death penalty as an immoral act. â€Å"It is one thing to kill murderers when there is reason to think it will protect innocents, but to kill them because of bare possibility that this might happens seems like exactly the kind of disrespectful treatment of the murderer that Kant condemned.† (Reiman, Jeffrey (1998). The Death Penalty: For and Against) Along with this argument he states, not only is it wrong to kill the murderer without having actual proof of it saving innocents but there is research showing an increase in murders following the time of executions. In that case, we are making things worst. How can we go and kill someone because they had taken away someone else’s life? That is a little hypocritical. We think by doing this we are retrieving justice, maybe they thought the same thing. They were trying to create their own retributive justice. If we as the society are going to choose to kill them anyway, why is it that the law does not let the society kill that person themselves? Why can’t they make their own retributive justice? The reason why they cannot do so is because it is wrong! Killing someone because of what they did is wrong. â€Å"The death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It is the premeditated and cold-blooded killing of a human being by the state. This cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment is done in the name of justice.† (Abolish the Death Penalty† www.amnesty.org/en/death-penalty) Yes, it was not right for them to commit that crime but they need to be punished in a way where they can understand why they were wrong and why they cannot do what they did. Isn’t the reason for punishment is to make that person understand they shouldn’t have done it and next time to know better? We as Americans have decided to change that idea. In response to this theory some wou ld say it was to deter future acts of crime, but when in fact it does not. â€Å"Defenders of capital punishment have argued that it deters crime. Studies on the deterrent effect have largely been inconclusive, with no firm evidence that the prospect of death sways criminals from their actions.† (Capital Punishment. (2002). In World of Criminal Justice, Gale. Farmington, MI: Thomson Gale. Retrieved December 09, 2008, from credoreference.com/entry/4827419/†) Like I stated earlier, I am not for the death penalty and I believe a corrupted system determines who is chosen for that punishment and the judgment is hypercritical. When people are being convicted, the decisions are rushed, sometimes based on racism, class, gender and the convicted are often innocent. The way court systems and juries convict people are merely an unfair act. Studies have shown that as many as one in seven people who are convicted to death row could be innocent, with a lot more who get off each year because they are proven innocent. The price of life is unlimited, but the U.S. puts a price on it. We are in fact killing innocent people. If you are in the wrong place at the wrong time and you don’t have proof to why you were there than basically you could be giving up your life. Guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt is too subtle. The government misuses this phrase and they are simply misusing the idea of the death penalty all together. â€Å"Death penalty opponents mounted another challenge in the early 1980s, arguing that racial bias had made the imposition of the penalty unequal. One study found that during a six-year period in Georgia, murderers whose victims were white were eleven times more likely to be sentenced to death than were killers whose victims were black. However, the Supreme Court rejected the use of statistical evidence to prove that the death penalty was imposed in a discriminatory or arbitrary way. Later studies have confirmed the disparity in the treatment of African-American and white killers.† (Capital Punishment. (2002). In World of Criminal Justice, Gale. Farmington, MI: Thomson Gale. Retrieved December 09, 2008, from â€Å"credoreference.com/entry/4827419†). The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) states that you are more than three times as likely to be sentenced to death if you are black rather than being white. The numbers grow significantly higher if you are black and ha ve killed a white person, and the numbers decrease if you are white and you have killed a black person. This is a good reason why we should not have the right to use the death penalty. This country is supposed to be non-racist, a place of equality and if our justice system has those defects in them, then they should not be allowed to make decisions involving those defects and in no way should the U.S be trusted with the death penalty. Some would ask but what about the justice for the victims’ and their families? Why do we care more about what happens to the convicted more than the justice for the victim? I truly believe that justice is the first thing that should be solved. But no matter how many people you incarcerate and no matter how many people you sentence to death, nothing could ever bring that person back. Nothing in the world could ever take the pain away. Justice for the victim would be teaching what is morally right and would help people who often feel as though they have no other choice but to harm someone to focus their anger or depression on something else. If we murder those who have murdered it is just making us as bad as they are. Justice is to stop future acts of crime. There are some who are convicted who shouldn’t get another chance because they feel as though what they did was right but almost in every case most of the convicted probably repented what they did. What if murderers felt like they were creating peace by killing and maybe they felt justified like we do when we kill them. Most people I believe are mixing retributive justice with revenge. The anger someone goes through when losing a loved one to an act of violence is unbearable, but sometimes we have to put our feelings aside and decide what would have the best outcome. I understand it is easier said than done but if we cannot get over our personal feelings than we should not have the right to make a decision of such serious nature like the death penalty. Every other country has abolished Capital Punishment. Why hasn’t the U.S.? This is because our minds are in the wrong place. Before we even decide to make it a regular form of punishment we need to fix the loose ends in our system and make sure it is an equal conviction for everyone. As I stated before, in the end capital punishment is just a vicious game of vengeance not justice and no one is winning and this is why capital punishment should be abolished. Research Papers on Capital PunishmentThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UseComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoHip-Hop is ArtPETSTEL analysis of IndiaEffects of Television Violence on ChildrenIncorporating Risk and Uncertainty Factor in CapitalThe Effects of Illegal ImmigrationGenetic EngineeringRelationship between Media Coverage and Social andAnalysis of Ebay Expanding into Asia

Capital Punishment

Capital Punishment Free Online Research Papers In my opinion capital punishment is morally not right. I am from Germany, were death penalty is nowadays prohibited by law for many years. Everybody is able to live there as an individual and around the next corner will not someone be waiting to kill you. But I think in some cases it would be very helpful to make capital punishment legal, as in the case of serial killers or people that do not learn form being imprisoned and commit a number of other crimes. I think the people that decide if a murderer get executed or not, and the people that fulfill an execution are murderers on their own. This does not make them much better than the person that was killed. It is morally not right to kill other people, just because they did kill someone. Murderers should stay imprisoned for many years and get a second chance to show good will. Then when they get free and commit another crime, then they should be punished for it. In this case I would really be for capital punishment because this person did not use the second chance to change and did not learn anything from the time spent in prison. I found out in some research that â€Å"the mix of drugs is unacceptable for putting dogs and cats to sleep† (http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ehost/pdf?vid=1hid=7sid=70c7fc1c-6945-468c-b6cb-234d4e8513b6%40sessionmgr7), so why should we use this mix of drugs to execute a person like us? This mix was invented by DR. Jay Chapman, that did not even have any knowledge about killing someone. There are also many reasons people kill other people. Some people are mentally ill and need rather a therapy than many years in prison; other people just kill for fun and will never learn, such as serial killers. Then there are also people that had to kill because they were in a certain situation and had to act in affect. While I was living in Germany, I sometimes heard about people that got the death penalty and were not even guilty. I think if there would not be a death penalty in too many cases, it would be more likely avoided to execute a wrong person. Even that people know that there is capital punishment in 22 states, do some people not care about it and still commit horrible crimes. If someone would want to stop crime at all, there must be a death penalty for almost every crime. This is already impossible by law written down in the â€Å"Bill of Rights†. A lot more cases of murders could be eliminated if the U.S. would change the regulations for weapons. People should not be allowed to buy weapons everywhere and to carry them around. People should obtain a license and they should only be allowed to have weapons for hunting in the woods and shooting at ranges. Another point that speaks against executions is, that the public has to pay for the executions. This means that tax payers are paying money to execute someone. I personally rather would pay money to keep someone imprisoned for a long time, than to pay for a execution. I also believe that it is gods decision to let someone die. So a murderer only fulfills gods will to kill a special person. It always hurts the family and people that knew the person that was killed. Another point I think that will be important for the future of the U.S. is that capital punishment should be limited or prohibited by law. Even in Puerto Rico, which is a territory of the U.S., the last death sentence executed was in 1927 and two years later the government abolished capital punishment. Today â€Å"two- thirds of Puerto Ricans oppose death penalty† (http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ehost/pdf?vid=1hid=8sid=d2944897-fd00-4842-9f32-a87c6735dabe%40sessionmgr3) and might be happy that it is prohibited now. In my opinion the US seems to live in the future but for real it still lives in the past. A country can be kept save using other ways than capital punishment. Many countries in the world do not support capital punishment and do prohibit it by law. These countries live in the future, know how to punish people right and know what is morally right. Research Papers on Capital PunishmentCapital PunishmentArguments for Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS)The Effects of Illegal ImmigrationThe Fifth HorsemanComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoGenetic EngineeringPersonal Experience with Teen PregnancyThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UseThe Masque of the Red Death Room meaningsAnalysis of Ebay Expanding into Asia Capital Punishment Free Online Research Papers The use of capital punishment is believed to deter future acts of crimes and deter the number of people who commit these crimes. Many years ago, capital punishment was almost used for anything such as stealing, murder, rape and even disrespect toward a higher authority but now it has been abolished in all countries except for the United States. Some believe that capital punishment should become, under law, a regular form of punishment and should be used against the ones who commit crimes. People who want to use it believe that it is the only justice that could be given to the victims of these crimes and to their families. In my opinion I don’t believe that the use of capital punishment makes any situation better or even brings back justice to the victim or their family. Even though it might see like the right idea, is this process really justified? If we are against murder it wouldn’t be right to commit the act ourselves, we would be contradicting ourselves. Is it reall y retributive justice? Or is it in fact a way to get back at the convicted and get the revenge they desire for. Before the use of capital punishment and prisons, when people participated in crimes, it would go unnoticed. As the government started to grow, they decided they had to change this. So the world created a system, which was used for two main purposes: to keep people who caused danger to others and/or also to themselves away from the community and the second was to rehabilitate those who were considered morally wrong for their actions and the community would be able to release them back into society. This is why they called it correctional facilities, to correct peoples’ wrong doings. It seemed like society had come up with a way to help reduce crimes. So how did capital punishment come into the picture? When executions were first used it was used by rulers in higher power. Executions were not just used to give the convicted what they deserved. Many people were executed because they robbed someone or went against that higher power. Executions were used to make an example out of that person and show everyone who had the power and let them know that you could not go against them. It seems not to some that incarceration is not doing enough and not creating the effect people thought it would. Now executions are seen as retributive justice. â€Å"Retributive justice is a theory of justice that considers that proportionate punishment is a morally acceptable response to crime, with an eye to the satisfaction and psychological benefits it can bestow to the aggrieved party and its intimates.† (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retributive_justice) Sentences to death row mainly consist of murderers and repeated offenders of heinous acts. After committing such heinous crimes, people believe that there is no way to help the convicted. They feel as though letting them out into the community would just put other peoples’ lives in danger. Retributive justice is a way to make the lives of the ones who were affected by the crime a little easier to cope with the pain. Since their loved ones’ lives were taken away, the one who committed the act will have his life taken as well. Since the murderers took others’ lives, society believes that they have forfeited their right to life. If we execute murderers and there is in fact no deterrent effect, we have killed a bunch of murderers. If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims. I would much rather risk the former. This, to me, is not a tough call. (John McAdams Marquette University/Department of Political Science, on deterrence, (prodeathpenalty.com/). As I had stated in my past essay, people would rather risk a murder’s life for no effect in helping the community than letting him go and having him commit more murders or other acts of violence and risking innocent lives. Once someone has commit a crime such as murder, that person did not value their victims’ life and obviously must not have valued their own life so why should anyone else take their life into consideration? Their life is of no importance so taking that away shouldn’t be a big problem. Even if you think they valued their li fe the other side is that they will probably go out and do it again. â€Å"Fifty-six percent of the violent felons convicted from 1990 through 2002 had a prior conviction, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistic †¦ the study found that at the time of the new crime 18 percent were on probation, 12 percent on release pending disposition of a prior case and 7 percent on parole.† (â€Å"Organized Crime Digest† Sept 30, 2006) This is where the use of capital punishment comes in. When society believes that they have a criminal who cannot be corrected and he is considered a threat to that society and himself, what is the use of him? Why keep him locked up for the rest of his life when he doesn’t even deserve that right? People who are for capital punishment would give the answer that there is no need for them to stay alive. Saving the society from future harm and giving back justice to the victims and their loved ones; that is the use of capital punishment. On the other side, if we are talking about what is morally right than most people of the U.S see the death penalty as an immoral act. â€Å"It is one thing to kill murderers when there is reason to think it will protect innocents, but to kill them because of bare possibility that this might happens seems like exactly the kind of disrespectful treatment of the murderer that Kant condemned.† (Reiman, Jeffrey (1998). The Death Penalty: For and Against) Along with this argument he states, not only is it wrong to kill the murderer without having actual proof of it saving innocents but there is research showing an increase in murders following the time of executions. In that case, we are making things worst. How can we go and kill someone because they had taken away someone else’s life? That is a little hypocritical. We think by doing this we are retrieving justice, maybe they thought the same thing. They were trying to create their own retributive justice. If we as the society are going to choose to kill them anyway, why is it that the law does not let the society kill that person themselves? Why can’t they make their own retributive justice? The reason why they cannot do so is because it is wrong! Killing someone because of what they did is wrong. â€Å"The death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It is the premeditated and cold-blooded killing of a human being by the state. This cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment is done in the name of justice.† (Abolish the Death Penalty† www.amnesty.org/en/death-penalty) Yes, it was not right for them to commit that crime but they need to be punished in a way where they can understand why they were wrong and why they cannot do what they did. Isn’t the reason for punishment is to make that person understand they shouldn’t have done it and next time to know better? We as Americans have decided to change that idea. In response to this theory some wou ld say it was to deter future acts of crime, but when in fact it does not. â€Å"Defenders of capital punishment have argued that it deters crime. Studies on the deterrent effect have largely been inconclusive, with no firm evidence that the prospect of death sways criminals from their actions.† (Capital Punishment. (2002). In World of Criminal Justice, Gale. Farmington, MI: Thomson Gale. Retrieved December 09, 2008, from credoreference.com/entry/4827419/†) Like I stated earlier, I am not for the death penalty and I believe a corrupted system determines who is chosen for that punishment and the judgment is hypercritical. When people are being convicted, the decisions are rushed, sometimes based on racism, class, gender and the convicted are often innocent. The way court systems and juries convict people are merely an unfair act. Studies have shown that as many as one in seven people who are convicted to death row could be innocent, with a lot more who get off each year because they are proven innocent. The price of life is unlimited, but the U.S. puts a price on it. We are in fact killing innocent people. If you are in the wrong place at the wrong time and you don’t have proof to why you were there than basically you could be giving up your life. Guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt is too subtle. The government misuses this phrase and they are simply misusing the idea of the death penalty all together. â€Å"Death penalty opponents mounted another challenge in the early 1980s, arguing that racial bias had made the imposition of the penalty unequal. One study found that during a six-year period in Georgia, murderers whose victims were white were eleven times more likely to be sentenced to death than were killers whose victims were black. However, the Supreme Court rejected the use of statistical evidence to prove that the death penalty was imposed in a discriminatory or arbitrary way. Later studies have confirmed the disparity in the treatment of African-American and white killers.† (Capital Punishment. (2002). In World of Criminal Justice, Gale. Farmington, MI: Thomson Gale. Retrieved December 09, 2008, from â€Å"credoreference.com/entry/4827419†). The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) states that you are more than three times as likely to be sentenced to death if you are black rather than being white. The numbers grow significantly higher if you are black and ha ve killed a white person, and the numbers decrease if you are white and you have killed a black person. This is a good reason why we should not have the right to use the death penalty. This country is supposed to be non-racist, a place of equality and if our justice system has those defects in them, then they should not be allowed to make decisions involving those defects and in no way should the U.S be trusted with the death penalty. Some would ask but what about the justice for the victims’ and their families? Why do we care more about what happens to the convicted more than the justice for the victim? I truly believe that justice is the first thing that should be solved. But no matter how many people you incarcerate and no matter how many people you sentence to death, nothing could ever bring that person back. Nothing in the world could ever take the pain away. Justice for the victim would be teaching what is morally right and would help people who often feel as though they have no other choice but to harm someone to focus their anger or depression on something else. If we murder those who have murdered it is just making us as bad as they are. Justice is to stop future acts of crime. There are some who are convicted who shouldn’t get another chance because they feel as though what they did was right but almost in every case most of the convicted probably repented what they did. What if murderers felt like they were creating peace by killing and maybe they felt justified like we do when we kill them. Most people I believe are mixing retributive justice with revenge. The anger someone goes through when losing a loved one to an act of violence is unbearable, but sometimes we have to put our feelings aside and decide what would have the best outcome. I understand it is easier said than done but if we cannot get over our personal feelings than we should not have the right to make a decision of such serious nature like the death penalty. Every other country has abolished Capital Punishment. Why hasn’t the U.S.? This is because our minds are in the wrong place. Before we even decide to make it a regular form of punishment we need to fix the loose ends in our system and make sure it is an equal conviction for everyone. As I stated before, in the end capital punishment is just a vicious game of vengeance not justice and no one is winning and this is why capital punishment should be abolished. Research Papers on Capital PunishmentThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UseComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoHip-Hop is ArtPETSTEL analysis of IndiaEffects of Television Violence on ChildrenIncorporating Risk and Uncertainty Factor in CapitalThe Effects of Illegal ImmigrationGenetic EngineeringRelationship between Media Coverage and Social andAnalysis of Ebay Expanding into Asia

Capital Punishment

Capital Punishment Free Online Research Papers In my opinion capital punishment is morally not right. I am from Germany, were death penalty is nowadays prohibited by law for many years. Everybody is able to live there as an individual and around the next corner will not someone be waiting to kill you. But I think in some cases it would be very helpful to make capital punishment legal, as in the case of serial killers or people that do not learn form being imprisoned and commit a number of other crimes. I think the people that decide if a murderer get executed or not, and the people that fulfill an execution are murderers on their own. This does not make them much better than the person that was killed. It is morally not right to kill other people, just because they did kill someone. Murderers should stay imprisoned for many years and get a second chance to show good will. Then when they get free and commit another crime, then they should be punished for it. In this case I would really be for capital punishment because this person did not use the second chance to change and did not learn anything from the time spent in prison. I found out in some research that â€Å"the mix of drugs is unacceptable for putting dogs and cats to sleep† (http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ehost/pdf?vid=1hid=7sid=70c7fc1c-6945-468c-b6cb-234d4e8513b6%40sessionmgr7), so why should we use this mix of drugs to execute a person like us? This mix was invented by DR. Jay Chapman, that did not even have any knowledge about killing someone. There are also many reasons people kill other people. Some people are mentally ill and need rather a therapy than many years in prison; other people just kill for fun and will never learn, such as serial killers. Then there are also people that had to kill because they were in a certain situation and had to act in affect. While I was living in Germany, I sometimes heard about people that got the death penalty and were not even guilty. I think if there would not be a death penalty in too many cases, it would be more likely avoided to execute a wrong person. Even that people know that there is capital punishment in 22 states, do some people not care about it and still commit horrible crimes. If someone would want to stop crime at all, there must be a death penalty for almost every crime. This is already impossible by law written down in the â€Å"Bill of Rights†. A lot more cases of murders could be eliminated if the U.S. would change the regulations for weapons. People should not be allowed to buy weapons everywhere and to carry them around. People should obtain a license and they should only be allowed to have weapons for hunting in the woods and shooting at ranges. Another point that speaks against executions is, that the public has to pay for the executions. This means that tax payers are paying money to execute someone. I personally rather would pay money to keep someone imprisoned for a long time, than to pay for a execution. I also believe that it is gods decision to let someone die. So a murderer only fulfills gods will to kill a special person. It always hurts the family and people that knew the person that was killed. Another point I think that will be important for the future of the U.S. is that capital punishment should be limited or prohibited by law. Even in Puerto Rico, which is a territory of the U.S., the last death sentence executed was in 1927 and two years later the government abolished capital punishment. Today â€Å"two- thirds of Puerto Ricans oppose death penalty† (http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ehost/pdf?vid=1hid=8sid=d2944897-fd00-4842-9f32-a87c6735dabe%40sessionmgr3) and might be happy that it is prohibited now. In my opinion the US seems to live in the future but for real it still lives in the past. A country can be kept save using other ways than capital punishment. Many countries in the world do not support capital punishment and do prohibit it by law. These countries live in the future, know how to punish people right and know what is morally right. Research Papers on Capital PunishmentCapital PunishmentArguments for Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS)The Effects of Illegal ImmigrationThe Fifth HorsemanComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoGenetic EngineeringPersonal Experience with Teen PregnancyThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UseThe Masque of the Red Death Room meaningsAnalysis of Ebay Expanding into Asia Capital Punishment Free Online Research Papers The use of capital punishment is believed to deter future acts of crimes and deter the number of people who commit these crimes. Many years ago, capital punishment was almost used for anything such as stealing, murder, rape and even disrespect toward a higher authority but now it has been abolished in all countries except for the United States. Some believe that capital punishment should become, under law, a regular form of punishment and should be used against the ones who commit crimes. People who want to use it believe that it is the only justice that could be given to the victims of these crimes and to their families. In my opinion I don’t believe that the use of capital punishment makes any situation better or even brings back justice to the victim or their family. Even though it might see like the right idea, is this process really justified? If we are against murder it wouldn’t be right to commit the act ourselves, we would be contradicting ourselves. Is it reall y retributive justice? Or is it in fact a way to get back at the convicted and get the revenge they desire for. Before the use of capital punishment and prisons, when people participated in crimes, it would go unnoticed. As the government started to grow, they decided they had to change this. So the world created a system, which was used for two main purposes: to keep people who caused danger to others and/or also to themselves away from the community and the second was to rehabilitate those who were considered morally wrong for their actions and the community would be able to release them back into society. This is why they called it correctional facilities, to correct peoples’ wrong doings. It seemed like society had come up with a way to help reduce crimes. So how did capital punishment come into the picture? When executions were first used it was used by rulers in higher power. Executions were not just used to give the convicted what they deserved. Many people were executed because they robbed someone or went against that higher power. Executions were used to make an example out of that person and show everyone who had the power and let them know that you could not go against them. It seems not to some that incarceration is not doing enough and not creating the effect people thought it would. Now executions are seen as retributive justice. â€Å"Retributive justice is a theory of justice that considers that proportionate punishment is a morally acceptable response to crime, with an eye to the satisfaction and psychological benefits it can bestow to the aggrieved party and its intimates.† (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retributive_justice) Sentences to death row mainly consist of murderers and repeated offenders of heinous acts. After committing such heinous crimes, people believe that there is no way to help the convicted. They feel as though letting them out into the community would just put other peoples’ lives in danger. Retributive justice is a way to make the lives of the ones who were affected by the crime a little easier to cope with the pain. Since their loved ones’ lives were taken away, the one who committed the act will have his life taken as well. Since the murderers took others’ lives, society believes that they have forfeited their right to life. If we execute murderers and there is in fact no deterrent effect, we have killed a bunch of murderers. If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims. I would much rather risk the former. This, to me, is not a tough call. (John McAdams Marquette University/Department of Political Science, on deterrence, (prodeathpenalty.com/). As I had stated in my past essay, people would rather risk a murder’s life for no effect in helping the community than letting him go and having him commit more murders or other acts of violence and risking innocent lives. Once someone has commit a crime such as murder, that person did not value their victims’ life and obviously must not have valued their own life so why should anyone else take their life into consideration? Their life is of no importance so taking that away shouldn’t be a big problem. Even if you think they valued their li fe the other side is that they will probably go out and do it again. â€Å"Fifty-six percent of the violent felons convicted from 1990 through 2002 had a prior conviction, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistic †¦ the study found that at the time of the new crime 18 percent were on probation, 12 percent on release pending disposition of a prior case and 7 percent on parole.† (â€Å"Organized Crime Digest† Sept 30, 2006) This is where the use of capital punishment comes in. When society believes that they have a criminal who cannot be corrected and he is considered a threat to that society and himself, what is the use of him? Why keep him locked up for the rest of his life when he doesn’t even deserve that right? People who are for capital punishment would give the answer that there is no need for them to stay alive. Saving the society from future harm and giving back justice to the victims and their loved ones; that is the use of capital punishment. On the other side, if we are talking about what is morally right than most people of the U.S see the death penalty as an immoral act. â€Å"It is one thing to kill murderers when there is reason to think it will protect innocents, but to kill them because of bare possibility that this might happens seems like exactly the kind of disrespectful treatment of the murderer that Kant condemned.† (Reiman, Jeffrey (1998). The Death Penalty: For and Against) Along with this argument he states, not only is it wrong to kill the murderer without having actual proof of it saving innocents but there is research showing an increase in murders following the time of executions. In that case, we are making things worst. How can we go and kill someone because they had taken away someone else’s life? That is a little hypocritical. We think by doing this we are retrieving justice, maybe they thought the same thing. They were trying to create their own retributive justice. If we as the society are going to choose to kill them anyway, why is it that the law does not let the society kill that person themselves? Why can’t they make their own retributive justice? The reason why they cannot do so is because it is wrong! Killing someone because of what they did is wrong. â€Å"The death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It is the premeditated and cold-blooded killing of a human being by the state. This cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment is done in the name of justice.† (Abolish the Death Penalty† www.amnesty.org/en/death-penalty) Yes, it was not right for them to commit that crime but they need to be punished in a way where they can understand why they were wrong and why they cannot do what they did. Isn’t the reason for punishment is to make that person understand they shouldn’t have done it and next time to know better? We as Americans have decided to change that idea. In response to this theory some wou ld say it was to deter future acts of crime, but when in fact it does not. â€Å"Defenders of capital punishment have argued that it deters crime. Studies on the deterrent effect have largely been inconclusive, with no firm evidence that the prospect of death sways criminals from their actions.† (Capital Punishment. (2002). In World of Criminal Justice, Gale. Farmington, MI: Thomson Gale. Retrieved December 09, 2008, from credoreference.com/entry/4827419/†) Like I stated earlier, I am not for the death penalty and I believe a corrupted system determines who is chosen for that punishment and the judgment is hypercritical. When people are being convicted, the decisions are rushed, sometimes based on racism, class, gender and the convicted are often innocent. The way court systems and juries convict people are merely an unfair act. Studies have shown that as many as one in seven people who are convicted to death row could be innocent, with a lot more who get off each year because they are proven innocent. The price of life is unlimited, but the U.S. puts a price on it. We are in fact killing innocent people. If you are in the wrong place at the wrong time and you don’t have proof to why you were there than basically you could be giving up your life. Guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt is too subtle. The government misuses this phrase and they are simply misusing the idea of the death penalty all together. â€Å"Death penalty opponents mounted another challenge in the early 1980s, arguing that racial bias had made the imposition of the penalty unequal. One study found that during a six-year period in Georgia, murderers whose victims were white were eleven times more likely to be sentenced to death than were killers whose victims were black. However, the Supreme Court rejected the use of statistical evidence to prove that the death penalty was imposed in a discriminatory or arbitrary way. Later studies have confirmed the disparity in the treatment of African-American and white killers.† (Capital Punishment. (2002). In World of Criminal Justice, Gale. Farmington, MI: Thomson Gale. Retrieved December 09, 2008, from â€Å"credoreference.com/entry/4827419†). The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) states that you are more than three times as likely to be sentenced to death if you are black rather than being white. The numbers grow significantly higher if you are black and ha ve killed a white person, and the numbers decrease if you are white and you have killed a black person. This is a good reason why we should not have the right to use the death penalty. This country is supposed to be non-racist, a place of equality and if our justice system has those defects in them, then they should not be allowed to make decisions involving those defects and in no way should the U.S be trusted with the death penalty. Some would ask but what about the justice for the victims’ and their families? Why do we care more about what happens to the convicted more than the justice for the victim? I truly believe that justice is the first thing that should be solved. But no matter how many people you incarcerate and no matter how many people you sentence to death, nothing could ever bring that person back. Nothing in the world could ever take the pain away. Justice for the victim would be teaching what is morally right and would help people who often feel as though they have no other choice but to harm someone to focus their anger or depression on something else. If we murder those who have murdered it is just making us as bad as they are. Justice is to stop future acts of crime. There are some who are convicted who shouldn’t get another chance because they feel as though what they did was right but almost in every case most of the convicted probably repented what they did. What if murderers felt like they were creating peace by killing and maybe they felt justified like we do when we kill them. Most people I believe are mixing retributive justice with revenge. The anger someone goes through when losing a loved one to an act of violence is unbearable, but sometimes we have to put our feelings aside and decide what would have the best outcome. I understand it is easier said than done but if we cannot get over our personal feelings than we should not have the right to make a decision of such serious nature like the death penalty. Every other country has abolished Capital Punishment. Why hasn’t the U.S.? This is because our minds are in the wrong place. Before we even decide to make it a regular form of punishment we need to fix the loose ends in our system and make sure it is an equal conviction for everyone. As I stated before, in the end capital punishment is just a vicious game of vengeance not justice and no one is winning and this is why capital punishment should be abolished. Research Papers on Capital PunishmentThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UseComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoHip-Hop is ArtPETSTEL analysis of IndiaEffects of Television Violence on ChildrenIncorporating Risk and Uncertainty Factor in CapitalThe Effects of Illegal ImmigrationGenetic EngineeringRelationship between Media Coverage and Social andAnalysis of Ebay Expanding into Asia